|
WEDNESDAY 10TH OCTOBER 2018
|
08:30
|
REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS
|
09:00
|
CHAIR’S OPENING REMARKS
Stephen Garwood, Professor of Structural
Integrity, Imperial College London
|
|
BACKGROUND AND
MOTIVATION
|
09:10
|
BACKGROUND, MOTIVATION & CHALLENGES –
THE ROLE FOR PROBABILISTICS
Keith Wright, Chief Stress Engineer,
Submarines, Rolls-Royce
Paul Donavin, Project Engineer and ASME Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
·
The Impact of
environmental fatigue: What does a Fatigue Usage Factor of unity mean and are
we trying to protect against?
·
Unquantified
margin drives need for more accurate predictive methods
·
The potential
for target reliability to quantify margin
·
What are we
doing about it, a shift from ASME, industrial and academic collaboration to
change the mind-set
|
09:35
|
TARGET RELIABILITIES IN STRUCTURAL
INTEGRITY
Simon
Williams, Chief Technologist – Nuclear Safety, Rolls-Royce Submarines
- An
overview of how structural integrity reliabilities are evaluated and
applied in naval reactor plant safety cases today.
- How
current naval reactor plant safety assessments could be used to reverse
engineer failure frequency targets for structural integrity analysis.
- Potential
benefits of this this approach, and potential constraints on its
usefulness in the context of demonstrating that risks are as low as
reasonably practicable.
|
10:00
|
RISK
INFORMED PERFORMANCE BASED APPROACH FOR DESIGNING AGAINST EXTREME EVENTS
Nawal Prinja, Technology Director,
(Nuclear) Wood plc
|
10:25
|
QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION
|
10.40
|
NETWORKING REFRESHMENT BREAK
|
|
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
|
11:10
|
NON-NUCLEAR PROBABILISTIC
APPLICATIONS
Mark Joyce, Group Leader,
Numerical Modelling, Frazer-Nash Consultancy
·
A general
approach to handling uncertainty in probabilistic modelling using Bayesian statistics
·
Deriving
benefit from inspection data for validation and model updating
·
Case studies:
Quantifying in service risk for gas turbines components and AGR
fuel moderator bricks
|
11:35
|
PROBABILISTIC
METHODS: APPLICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Julian
Booker, Professor of Mechanical Design Engineering, Solid Mechanics Group, University of Bristol
·
Applying
probabilistic methods and implementing more generally probabilistic
frameworks for design, analysis and assessment in engineering
·
Examples and
case studies from the nuclear and other sectors to highlight and demonstrate
the issues faced,
·
Broader
discussion of the particular merits of probabilistic approaches over
deterministic ones
|
12:00
|
APPLICATION OF PROBABILISTIC FRACTURE
MECHANICS (PFM) IN QUANTIFYING THE ROLE OF WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS IN
FRACTURE ASSESSMENT
Isabel Hadley, Technology Fellow, Integrity
Management Group, TWI Ltd
·
An overview of the increasing interest in probabilistic
fracture mechanics
·
Investigating the application of probabilistic
techniques to the assessment of fracture in the presence of welding residual
stresses.
·
Welding Residual stress (RS) as an important variable
in the assessment of fracture susceptibility and how best to quantify it.
·
Collaboration between TWI Ltd and the University of
Bristol as well as other stakeholders
|
12.25
|
QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION
|
12:40
|
NETWORKING LUNCH
|
|
EXAMPLES
OF APPLICATIONS IN DESIGN, OPERATION AND DECOMMISSION
|
13:40
|
PROBABILISTIC
DESIGN OF DEMO IN-VESSEL COMPONENTS
Mutaz Bashir, Principal Engineering Analyst
(Codes & Standards)
UKAEA
- Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
Paul Smith, Consultant, New Nuclear, Wood plc
·
Summary of the development of the Demo Design Criteria
(DDC)
·
What are the objectives and framework for DDC?
·
A detailed example on the feasibility of the
development of probabilistic design approach
|
14.05
|
USING
PROBABILISTICS TO EXTEND EVAPORATOR OPERATING LIFE
Caroline Pyke, Senior Statistician, National Nuclear Laboratory
·
An outline of the evaporator and the initial problems
·
Modelling solutions: Using non-linear mixed effects
models
·
The incorporation of uncertainty in prediction –
bootstrapping and Monte-Carlo simulation
·
A word of caution – combining realism and pessimism
|
14:30
|
PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF AGR NUCLEAR
FUEL PLUG INTEGRITY DURING FUEL
Tom Siddall, Group Head, Structural
Analysis Group, EDF-Energy
|
14:55
|
QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION
|
15:10
|
NETWORKING
REFRESHMENT BREAK
|
|
FUTURE
VISION OF PROBABILISTIC STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR NUCLEAR MATERIALS
|
15:40
|
RISK-INFORMED
APPROACHES FOR IN-SERVICE INSPECTIONS
Tim Jelfs,
Acting Head of Nuclear Island, Horizon Nuclear Power
·
Horizon Nuclear Power –
introduction to the company and its plans to construct Advanced Boiling Water
Reactors in the UK
·
Summary of the GDA and
Licensing activities and the company’s aspirations to be a top-performing
plant
·
Drive towards an increase in
capacity factor – can a risk-informed approach to inspection help reduce
outage duration?
|
16:05
|
NUCLEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY PROBABILISTIC
WORKING PRINCIPLES
Mike Martin, Engineering Associate Fellow –
Structural Integrity, Rolls-Royce
·
What
are the objectives of the nuclear structural integrity probabilistics working
group?
·
Proposed
working principles for nuclear structural integrity assessment
·
Guidance
on terminology, application and benefits of probabilistic approaches
·
Future
work including validation requirements and compendium of worked examples
|
16:30
|
PANEL DISCUSSION: STAKEHOLDER VIEWS ON THE
PROPOSED DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FOR PROBABILISTIC METHODS
Andy Holt, Professional Lead for Structural
Integrity, ONR
David Langbridge, Head of DNSR, Defence Nuclear
Safety Regulator
Nawal Prinja, Technology Director,
(Nuclear) Wood plc
Keith Wright, Chief Stress Engineer,
Submarines, Rolls-Royce
|
17:00
|
CHAIR’S
CLOSING REMARKS
Stephen
Garwood, Professor of Structural Integrity, Imperial College London
|
17:10
|
END
OF SEMINAR
|